🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries